Katie "big tits" Kox

lvcleavage · Veteran Member

Katie "big tits" Kox

techs1 · Guru

Freeones says she has fake boobs. http://www.freeones.com/html/k_links/bio_Katie_Kox.php

lvcleavage · Veteran Member

techs1 wrote:

Freeones says she has fake boobs. http://www.freeones.com/html/k_links/bio_Katie_Kox.php

Well you know what? Phuck the "fake titty" patrol furious

Sauron81 · Guru

lvcleavage wrote:

techs1 wrote:

Freeones says she has fake boobs. http://www.freeones.com/html/k_links/bio_Katie_Kox.php

Well you know what? Phuck the "fake titty" patrol

You can be how mad you want, that won't change KMG's opinion on working with girls with fake boobs.

You hav seen the poll i made right ? most users here want to see both natural and girls with fake boobs, but KMG will not change the forumula so we just have to accept it as it is right now.

lvcleavage · Veteran Member

Sauron81 wrote:

lvcleavage wrote:

techs1 wrote:

Freeones says she has fake boobs. http://www.freeones.com/html/k_links/bio_Katie_Kox.php

Well you know what? Phuck the "fake titty" patrol

You can be how mad you want, that won't change KMG's opinion on working with girls with fake boobs.
You hav seen the poll i made right ? most users here want to see both natural and girls with fake boobs, but KMG will not change the forumula so we just have to accept it as it is right now.

I've been here long enough to know what they like but still phuck the titty patrol wink

WD36 · Senior Member

love this chic but unfortunately unless KMG decides to deviate from their "no silicone" policy this wonderful women is disqualified from being on this site.

sitsat · Veteran Member

I totally stand by KMG's "no silicone" policy, and actually wish more companies would step up and adopt the same stance. Then we wouldn't have women mutilating themselves to achieve some bizarre ideal that exists only in their perceptions. Real women have natural breasts; fake breasts are for sex objects. I want to see real women.

MorSizzler · Senior Member

While I understand that some people prefer the natural and some enjoy the enhanced breasts. That arguement will go on long after we're all gone. However I do have to draw the line when someone passes judgement on who are "real women" and who are not. It's one thing to say you don't prefer enhanced breasts. But no one...and I mean NO ONE....has the right to tell girls who have their breasts augmented that they're not real women. Especially when it's a man who has the cojones to make a statement like that. Whether a woman has enhanced breasts or not....it's got absolutely nothing to do with what makes her a woman or not. If a man has a visectomy, does that not make him a man? Or is that okay because you just can't see the results of the surgery? Nope, no one here or anywhere has any right to pass that kind of judgement on a woman. I'd love to see if anyone here who claims that would have the same cojones to walk up to one of these women post-surgery and say it to her face. Easy to throw this nonsense around on the internet when you're just pecking at a keyboard in the privacy of your room.

Bottom line....women who surgically augment their breasts are every bit "a real woman" as any other. And no one has the right to say otherwise. Period.

sitsat · Veteran Member

Erm, I think you totally missed the point. Silicon is not flesh, hence not a part of the woman's natural body. It can thus be described using the words 'fake', 'not real', etc.

When we talk about 'real' women, we're talking about natural women, and in the context of this discussion it is the correct descriptive. I don't know whether you're being deliberately pedantic in suggesting that I meant something else, but I suspect you really knew what was being said and just wanted to make a fiery comeback.

When a woman gets fake breasts, she is mutilating a part of her body and replacing it with something artificial purely to make herself more sexually appealing. Essentially, she is denigrating herself - nobody is doing that for her. She is objectifying herself at the risk of her personal health.

And if you still don't understand what I'm talking about, try looking up the term "self-objectification".

MorSizzler · Senior Member

I don't believe I'm being pedantic when objecting to your reference of women with implants as being "fake" or "real" women. That kind of terminology provokes a response that you got. Same response should come if a male was refered to as a "real" or "fake" man in the same circumstances.

A breast implant is an artificial appliance, you are absolutely correct. But it does not impact whether a woman is "real" or "fake" and should not be referred to as such. Especially by a male making the comment. Words and phrases are important in communication, especially when using words or phrases that could be construing a comment on the authenticity of a female as a woman. It was your usage, not mine.

I could suggest that instead of using the words as you did, refer to the appliance or impant as producing an artificial appearance....but not as a "fake" or "real" woman. As you mention in your first sentence below, you are right in judging silicon as artificial. But refer to the implant, not the person in your statement. I'm not trying to mince words here. But any reference judging a person as real or fake is important enough to use the words to more accurately describe what you're trying to say.

I was not attempting a "fiery" comeback, but responding to the words you used. If you meant to describe the implant and not the person, then do so. And I do apologize if this is coming across as anything less than a friendly response, I don't mean any disrespect to you or the conversational thread. You have every right to your opinion and I respect that. I just don't agree with a general reference to a woman being real or not.