For my part, there are implants, on the one hand, and implants, on the other hand.
I'm not against implants, but totally against apparent scars etc.
So, we'll tell me i'm against implants. In this case, yes.
But, it's also right that some implants are almost imperceptible on some girls.

Keep it natural please!

And the fact that the OP compared this to racism is just....total facepalm.

I think it's because they don't want more subscribers. I don't appreciate a minority dictating what content gets shot or not.

Just because some members don't want girls with enhanced breasts doesn't mean that everyone doesn't. You know what the nice thing about subscribing to a porn site is? You can pick and choose what scenes you don't want to watch. Not everyone is going to like every scene.

Guess what? I don't find black women to be very attractive. Let's ban black women from KissMeGirl!

Educational Purposes Only wrote:

---

I think it's because they don't want more subscribers. I don't appreciate a minority dictating what content gets shot or not.

Just because some members don't want girls with enhanced breasts doesn't mean that everyone doesn't. You know what the nice thing about subscribing to a porn site is? You can pick and choose what scenes you don't want to watch. Not everyone is going to like every scene.

Guess what? I don't find black women to be very attractive. Let's ban black women from KissMeGirl!

---

Could not have said it better myself. Who in the world wants a site where there is zero chance of seeing some performers because of some hair brained femenist agenca KMG is pushing. If you don't like the scene then don't watch it but don't ban a performers because they have augmented breasts. KMG, you said "We have nothing personally against girls with implants"; Maybe not against the girls but I don't buy that you don't have a femenist agenda against breast implants. And this is coming from a guy who is not even into breast. For all I care a woman could be concave in that area as long as the ass, thighs, and legs are bangin.

nrop36 wrote:

---

Educational Purposes Only wrote:

---

I think it's because they don't want more subscribers. I don't appreciate a minority dictating what content gets shot or not.

Just because some members don't want girls with enhanced breasts doesn't mean that everyone doesn't. You know what the nice thing about subscribing to a porn site is? You can pick and choose what scenes you don't want to watch. Not everyone is going to like every scene.

Guess what? I don't find black women to be very attractive. Let's ban black women from KissMeGirl!

---

Could not have said it better myself. Who in the world wants a site where there is zero chance of seeing some performers because of some hair brained femenist agenca KMG is pushing. If you don't like the scene then don't watch it but don't ban a performers because they have augmented breasts. KMG, you said "We have nothing personally against girls with implants"; Maybe not against the girls but I don't buy that you don't have a femenist agenda against breast implants. And this is coming from a guy who is not even into breast. For all I care a woman could be concave in that area as long as the ass, thighs, and legs are bangin.

---

 I still find this to be a silly amusing topic. The web allows sites to focus on wide variety of fetishes/likes, so that sites can cater to specific desires. There are site's dedicated to girls with huge asses, do you complain because they don't shoot girls with skinny asses. What about a teen site that doesn't shoot MILF's? There are plenty of sites that don't shoot implants, we're far far from the only one. I would imagine there are sites dedicated to girls with huge implants, should they shoot girls with tiny natural boobs? Everyone has become too politically correct these days, I guess every site that hasn't shot a girl from New Zealand, must hate New Zealand. :)

People are complaining about the natural rule at KMG not because they think KMG is being unfair, but because they want to see particular females participate in the scene.
I personally support the 'only natural girls' rule simple because the breast play in these scenes are a major draw for me and I think this would be affected.

I greatly support the fact that KMG listens to their viewers and that they are pretty unique in this aspect, but it sounds like they have a rule not to feature girls with implants and that should be respected.
Imagine you wrote to Evil Angel and asked them to please show less gapes in their anal themed movies, they'd tell you to go f yourself.
Having said that I understand that people want to see the 'performer they love with fakies' and this is why they are rallying.

I believe the only solution / compromise to the rule is if KMG only features the most highly requested female stars with implants as voted by the members.
This way they can half keep their rule of only natural while at the same time appeasing the audience.
Either that of KMG could just tell us to go f ourselves :p

It will be impossible for KMG to shoot only the most requested enhanced girl cause there will always be people complaining except this time it will be because their favorite enhanced girl didn't get a scene here.

Educational Purposes Only wrote:

---

Again, the problem is that this site is called "KissMe Girl," not "Natural Girl."

This lack of willingness to work with "enhanced" performers is completely arbitrary. It has nothing to do with kissing or lesbianism; it is this website owner's personal preferences for how a woman should look being projected upon its content.

It is as arbitrary as refusing to work with performers who have a tattoo or a piercing.

 

-- Edited by Educational Purposes Only on Saturday 23rd of March 2013 03:38:02 AM

---

 Well, I disagree. Your point may be somewhat valid if our scenes had nothing to with the girl's body, if they only sat and kissed fully clothed. If you applied your logic to all sites, then no site could focus on any specific content. For example, if there was an Asian anal site, you would argue that they should shoot white girls because being Asian has nothing to do with with anal sex.

Many sites focus only on natural girls, some also don't allow tatoos. Enhanced breasts have a very distinctive look in most cases, enhanced breasts themselves could be a fetish. We simply elect to shoot girls with the natural look, it's not really that complicated. Appying your logic would mean no site could focus on any type of look because the look has nothing to do with sex. Once again, for example, no site could focus on redheads because being a redhead has nothing to with having sex.

Girls with tiny boobs is also a fetish, should they also be required to shoot enhanced breasts unless all the girls do is show they're boobs?

The girls here do much more than just kiss, there's plenty of body play, and it's always been that way, so to suggest that the breasts should be meaningless in the scenes is broken logic.

Natural and Enhanced provide two very different looks and appeals and both can be a fetish in their own right. To suggest that a site can't be dedicated to one or the other is simply silly.

I saw that you also posted that we have the policy because we don't want more customers. Busted, you figured us out, we want fewer customers, :)

Seriously though, we appreciate the feedback, we just will have to agree to disagree.

-- Edited by KissMe Girl on Saturday 23rd of March 2013 07:43:45 AM

-- Edited by KissMe Girl on Saturday 23rd of March 2013 07:47:32 AM

mgf wrote:

---

Hi Elanor.

 

"hey specalise in the natural look and a certain style of kissing. We all knew this before we signed up. Let's not act like we were tricked."

Generally speaking the type of kissing featured on KMG has changed dramatically since the site first started.

 

"The site focuses primarily on kissing, but inbetween there is ALOT of breast play happening. If there wasn't then this enhanced performers dicussion thing wouldn't be an issue would it?"

I wounder if those members (who are not in support of stars with implants featuring on this site) would fear that the level of current brest play would decrease in scenes with girls who have undertaken the procedure?

---

Yes. The style has changed some what. They tried a kissing style and decided to change it up a little. But it was on their terms. What has stayed consistent is natural girls only.

 

In answer to the question, I don't fear less breast play.

What I do fear is the breast play in general. As it is, they slap, squeeze, tweak, lean on and ripple each others breasts. You can't do the same thing with enhanced breasts. And like I said there is ALOT of breast play, so aside from the kissing the rest of it will be watching someone squeezing a bag of silicone.

-- Edited by Elanor on Saturday 23rd of March 2013 11:47:23 AM

Educational Purposes Only wrote:

---

Again, the problem is that this site is called "KissMe Girl," not "Natural Girl."

This lack of willingness to work with "enhanced" performers is completely arbitrary. It has nothing to do with kissing or lesbianism; it is this website owner's personal preferences for how a woman should look being projected upon its content.

It is as arbitrary as refusing to work with performers who have a tattoo or a piercing.

 

-- Edited by Educational Purposes Only on Saturday 23rd of March 2013 03:38:02 AM

---

 Just because the site is natural only, it doesn't mean that's how how the site owner thinks all women should look.

There are tons of sites, milfs only, teens only, big asses only, big boobs only, blondes only. That doesn't nessesarily imply that is what the site owner thinks all women should look like.

It means they are catering to a certain audience.