Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Genuine Girls Versus Just For The Money Girls


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 742
Date:
Genuine Girls Versus Just For The Money Girls


Thought I would open this topic after reading some comments in another thread.

One of the unfortunate side effects of porn's saturation is that we now have an industry infested with girls who only work in porn for the money, they don't take any pleasure in it, and many don't even enjoy sex. There are many girls who perform in girl/girl scenes, yet have no sexual interest in women.

Many of the girls we shoot complain about having to deal with this situation because it's a giant turn off.

So anyway, provide your thoughts. We try super hard to stay away from these "Pay Check" girls, and I wish every producer would do the same.

If you're a young girl who dislikes sex, porn is no place for you.



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 28
Date:

I really see no problem with the girls not having sexual interest in women, as long as it doesn't effect the quality of the scene. At the end of the day, the is a business, and as long as the end product is of high quality, anything else doesn't matter much (assuming no one forced the people involved into doing anything they don't want to do!!).

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 30
Date:

It is absolutely essential that the girls are genuinely attracted to other girls. It shows when they are not, and it really makes a scene useless. For this site it's important that the girl is comfortable having another girls tongue deep inside her mouth quite regularly and that she is willing to meet that with her own tongue. Some girls here have been majorly uncomforatable with deep tongue action in some of the scenes and it has shown. However, alot of the girls do a great job and make good scenes where they are quite confortable with deep girl/girl tongue contact. Examples of girls who are comfortable with deep tongue action on this site would be Vicki Chase, Charlie Chase, Anikka Albrite, Natash Nice, Dani Daniels, Amy Brooke, and Abby Cross. The comfort these girls show with a woman's tongue in their mouths and vice versa is the standard to measure other girls by. Pick their strongest scenes and compare them with new talent and you will know where your new talent stands. It's a good way to know if the new girls are KMG material as the aforementioned girls definitely are. There are some girls, and particularly some of the newer girls who are not quite as into girls, or as into tongue kissing them deeply at least, as the girls I just mentioned. You can see it in the ackward way they hold there mouths when they kiss, and how mechanical their kissing is. Or how the tongue kissing gets really deminished with some girls as the scene goes on. I'm not calling any names though because it's easy enough for KMG to notice this in a scene when they review their product, assuming KMG reviews it's scenes to see whose performing well and whose not. Basically I don't like KMG performers who are stingy with their tongues. It's quite boring and I can get scenes with girls doing a bunch of lips only kissing and "barely" tongue kissing with just the tips of their tongues anywhere. But I can only get good quality, long tongued, full contact tongue kissing from KMG. There is another site which I won't mention but the kissing suuucccckkssss. The girls are all stiff and their kissing is mechanical because they don't want to do it. So yes it is ABSOLUTELY necessary that they are "Strongly" attracted to girls and "Like" tongue kissing girls deeply.



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 154
Date:

I'd bet my left testicle that neither Bree Daniels or Ash Hollywood....are as they say "Gay For Pay".....

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard